Augustin v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Augustin v. Board of Elections

83 A.D.2d 890, 443 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15290

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 27, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.2d 890 (Augustin v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Augustin v. Board of Elections, 83 A.D.2d 890, 443 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating the petitioner as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on September 10, 1981 for the public office of Councilman from the 26th Councilmanic District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), dated August 17,1981, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The appellant has failed to properly perfect his appeal in that the minutes of the hearing in this matter have not been produced. These minutes are necessary to consider appellant’s factual allegations. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Margett and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating the petitioner as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on September 10, 1981 for the public office of Councilman from the 26th Councilmanic District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), dated August 17,1981, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The appellant has failed to properly perfect his appeal in that the minutes of the hearing in this matter have not been produced. These minutes are necessary to consider appellant’s factual allegations. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Margett and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 890, 443 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustin-v-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1981.