Augusta v. State

95 So. 304, 85 Fla. 72
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 304 (Augusta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Augusta v. State, 95 So. 304, 85 Fla. 72 (Fla. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record of the conviction of the plaintiff in cx-rov of murder in the first degree discloses no material error that could l-easonably have , prejudiced the rights of the defendant in the trial; and as the evidence [73]*73amply sustains the verdict, the judgment entered thereon accords with law and is affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 304, 85 Fla. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augusta-v-state-fla-1923.