Augusta v. State

95 So. 624, 85 Fla. 149
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 30, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record of the conviction of the plaintiff in error of murder in the first degree discloses no material error that could reasonably have prejudiced the rights of the defendant in the trial; and as the evidence amply sustains the verdict, the judgment entered thereon accords with law and is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Augusta v. State, 95 So. 624, 85 Fla. 149 (Fla. 1923).

95 So. 624 (Augusta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund
37 Fla. 266 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1896)