Augusta Southern Railway Co. v. City of Tennille

47 S.E. 179, 119 Ga. 804, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 365
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 29, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 47 S.E. 179 (Augusta Southern Railway Co. v. City of Tennille) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Augusta Southern Railway Co. v. City of Tennille, 47 S.E. 179, 119 Ga. 804, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 365 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Turner, J.

1! The act of December 15,1900, incorporating the City of Tennille, in express terms declares that no suit shall be brought against that municipality save in its corporate name, to wit: “The City of Tennille.” Acts of 1900, p. 448. sec. 3.

2. It follows that a petition brought, apparently, with a view to seeking relief ■ as against that municipal corporation, but in which process is prayed against the “Mayor and Council of the City of Tennille, a corporation,” is not maintainable. Boon v. Mayor & Council of Jackson, 98 Ga. 490; Town of Dexter v. Gay, 115 Ga. 765. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Highway Department of Georgia v. REED, MAYOR
84 S.E.2d 561 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Storey v. Town of Summerville
123 S.E. 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Thrasher v. Town of Center
69 S.E. 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Fowler v. Rome Dispensary
62 S.E. 660 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Town of East Rome v. City of Rome
58 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Rhodes v. City of Louisville
49 S.E. 681 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 S.E. 179, 119 Ga. 804, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augusta-southern-railway-co-v-city-of-tennille-ga-1904.