Augusta Fish Co. v. Seats

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Augusta Fish Co. v. Seats

113 S.E. 56, 28 Ga. App. 804, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 875

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 24, 1922

Docket12997

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 56 (Augusta Fish Co. v. Seats) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Augusta Fish Co. v. Seats, 113 S.E. 56, 28 Ga. App. 804, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 875 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

This being a suit to recover for damage to an automobile truck belonging to the plaintiff, alleged to have happened while the truck was being used by the defendant without authority, and it appearing, from, the evidence, that the defendant was in the employ-of the plaintiff and used the truck upon certain occasions with [805]*805authority from the plaintiff, in the furtherance of the plaintiff’s business, and it not appearing that the truck was damaged by any negligence of the defendant or when being used by the defendant without authority, a nonsuit was properly awarded.

Decided July 24, 1922.

Action for damages; from city court of Richmond county — Judge Black. September 23, 1921.

John J. Jonas, for plaintiff. TP. Inman Gurry, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

This being a suit to recover for damage to an automobile truck belonging to the plaintiff, alleged to have happened while the truck was being used by the defendant without authority, and it appearing, from, the evidence, that the defendant was in the employ-of the plaintiff and used the truck upon certain occasions with [805]*805authority from the plaintiff, in the furtherance of the plaintiff’s business, and it not appearing that the truck was damaged by any negligence of the defendant or when being used by the defendant without authority, a nonsuit was properly awarded.

Decided July 24, 1922.

Action for damages; from city court of Richmond county — Judge Black. September 23, 1921.

John J. Jonas, for plaintiff. TP. Inman Gurry, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 S.E. 56, 28 Ga. App. 804, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augusta-fish-co-v-seats-gactapp-1922.