August v. Mitchell
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D REVISED AUGUST 25, 2003 August 20, 2003 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Charles R. Fulbruge III FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Clerk
No. 02-30318
THEODORE JOHNSON Plaintiff-Appellee versus
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; ET AL Defendants
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; STATE OF LOUISIANA; PRESIDENT OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM; BOARD OF REGENTS
Defendants-Appellants
No. 02-30369
LYNN AUGUST Plaintiff-Appellee versus
SUZANNE MITCHELL; MAE NELSON; ED BARRAS; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, for the State of Louisiana
Defendants-Appellants - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana - - - - -
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion May 5, 2003, 5 Cir., 2003, _____F.3d____)
(August 20, 2003) BEFORE: KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service has requested a
poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellee
Theodore Johnson and a majority of the judges in active service
have voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc. Further, a
majority of judges in active service have determined, on the
Court’s own motion, to rehear en banc the consolidated case, Lynn
August vs. Suzanne Mitchell, Et Al.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that these cases shall be
reheard by the court en banc. No decision has yet been made with
respect to oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing
schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
August v. Mitchell (August v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.