August Parker v. Alberto Zavala
This text of 459 F. App'x 651 (August Parker v. Alberto Zavala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
•This is an appeal from a motion for summary judgment; the facts are not repeated as the parties are familiar with them. We are constrained to interpret 38 U.S.C. § 1970(a) of the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Act to require strict compliance with its provisions regarding the designation of beneficiaries. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Perez, 51 F.3d 197, 198-99 (9th Cir.1995). At the time of the insured’s death, the Army had only August *652 Marie Parker listed as a designated beneficiary on file in its records. Appellants proffered no evidence to establish a triable issue of fact as to another properly designated beneficiary, or that the designation of Parker was for some reason invalid. Marks v. United States, 578 F.2d 261, 263 (9th Cir.1978).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 F. App'x 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/august-parker-v-alberto-zavala-ca9-2011.