August Image, LLC v. Jotform, Inc.

C.D. California

August Image, LLC v. Jotform, Inc.

DecidedAugust 6, 2024

Docket2:24-cv-03690

StatusUnknown

This text of August Image, LLC v. Jotform, Inc. (August Image, LLC v. Jotform, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

August Image, LLC v. Jotform, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AUGUST IMAGE, LLC, ) Case No. CV 24-3690 FMO (MRWx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 JOTFORM, INC., et al., ) ) 14 Defendants. ) ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 16, 17 Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed 18 without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than forty-five 19 (45) days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full 20 jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to 21 re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall 22 be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 23 P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 24 Dated this 6th day of August, 2024. 25 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 26 United States District Judge 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AUGUST IMAGE, LLC, ) Case No. CV 24-3690 FMO (MRWx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 JOTFORM, INC., et al., ) ) 14 Defendants. ) ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 16, 17 Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed 18 without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than forty-five 19 (45) days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full 20 jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to 21 re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall 22 be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 23 P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 24 Dated this 6th day of August, 2024. 25 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 26 United States District Judge 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

August Image, LLC v. Jotform, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/august-image-llc-v-jotform-inc-cacd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack