August Hebert v. United States

Fifth Circuit

August Hebert v. United States

860 F.2d 607, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 37323, 1986 WL 22007

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 19, 1986

Docket86-3209

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 860 F.2d 607 (August Hebert v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

August Hebert v. United States, 860 F.2d 607, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 37323, 1986 WL 22007 (5th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED pursuant to Fifth Circuit Local Rule 47.6. Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc., 488 So.2d 934 (La.1986), cited by appellant, does not modify the rule of Klohn v. Louisiana Power & Light, 406 So.2d 577 (La.1981), or Thomas v. Calavar Cory., 679 F.2d 416 (5th Cir.1982), which analyze the statutory employer status of government entities.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED pursuant to Fifth Circuit Local Rule 47.6. Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc., 488 So.2d 934 (La.1986), cited by appellant, does not modify the rule of Klohn v. Louisiana Power & Light, 406 So.2d 577 (La.1981), or Thomas v. Calavar Cory., 679 F.2d 416 (5th Cir.1982), which analyze the statutory employer status of government entities.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

860 F.2d 607, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 37323, 1986 WL 22007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/august-hebert-v-united-states-ca5-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack