August F. Stauff & Co. v. United States
This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 398 (August F. Stauff & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[399]*399Opinion by
At the trial plaintiff's witness testified that the engine parts listed on pages 1 and 2 of commercial invoice No. 78566, attached to the entry herein, are for the same type of machines, namely, Bolinder vertical diesel engines, weighing less than 2,500 pounds. It appeared from the record that the parts listed on page 1 of the commercial invoice were returned by the collector at the rate here claimed, but as to the engine parts enumerated on page 2 of said invoice, a continuation sheet, the collector assessed duty applicable to parts of engines weighing more than 2,500 pounds. The evidence submitted by the plaintiff not having been controverted the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the items enumerated on page 2 of commercial invoice No. 78566.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Cust. Ct. 398, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/august-f-stauff-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.