August E. Schartner, Jr. v. Hon. Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia

450 F.2d 748, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7533
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 1971
Docket71-2285
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 450 F.2d 748 (August E. Schartner, Jr. v. Hon. Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
August E. Schartner, Jr. v. Hon. Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, 450 F.2d 748, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7533 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

August E. Schartner, Jr. filed a complaint under the Civil Rights Act 1 against the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, and the Honorable Sidney O. Smith, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking 1,000,000 dollars in damages for their alleged negligence and/or false representations in the performance of their official duties arising from the erroneous dismissal of Schartner’s petition for ha-beas corpus on grounds of mootness.

*749 The court below dismissed the appellant’s civil rights action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The ruling of the district court is correct since officials of the United States Government are immune from liability under the Civil Rights Act for acts done under color of federal law, without a specific allegation that their acts were the result of a conspiracy to deprive the appellant of his federally protected rights. Gallizzi v. Williams, 423 F.2d 1213 (5th Cir. 1970); Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied 380 U.S. 981, 85 S.Ct. 1345, 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965); United States v. Faneca, 332 F.2d 872 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied 380 U.S. 971, 85 S.Ct. 1327,14 L.Ed.2d 268 (1965); Heyward v. Public Housing Administration, 238 F.2d 689 (5th Cir. 1956); Gregoire v. Biddle, 177 F.2d 579 (2nd Cir. 1948), cert, denied 339 U.S. 949, 70 S.Ct. 803, 94 L.Ed.2d 1363 (1950). Cf. Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 91 S.Ct. 1790, 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971).

Affirmed.

1

. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 et seq., 28 U.S.C.A. § 1343.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Centennial Land & Dev. Co. v. Tp. of Medford
397 A.2d 1136 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Centennial Land & Development Co. v. Township of Medford
397 A.2d 1136 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Schartner v. Clark
450 F.2d 749 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 F.2d 748, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/august-e-schartner-jr-v-hon-sidney-o-smith-jr-judge-u-s-ca5-1971.