Augstein v. Banska A Hutni Akciova Spolecnost
282 A.D. 929, 125 N.Y.S.2d 647
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The orders appealed from are modified to the extent that the objections of the defendants to the jurisdiction of the court are overruled, and in the exercise of discretion defendants are allowed to allege the same facts presented upon this motion in their respective answers (Civ. Prac. Act, § 237-a, subd. 3, par. [c]). Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel
and Bastow, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm; Callahan, J., taking no part. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Augstein v. Banska A Hutni Akciova Spolecnost, 282 A.D. 929, 125 N.Y.S.2d 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).
282 A.D. 929 (Augstein v. Banska A Hutni Akciova Spolecnost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Israel-British Bank (London) Limited
401 F. Supp. 1159 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Schwartz v. Compania Azucarera Vertientes- Camaguey De Cuba
28 Misc. 2d 355 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Stephen v. Zivnostenska Banka
31 Misc. 2d 45 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)