Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Augstein v. Banska A Hutni Akciova Spolecnost

Augstein v. Banska A Hutni Akciova Spolecnost

282 A.D. 929, 125 N.Y.S.2d 647
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 282 A.D. 929 (Augstein v. Banska A Hutni Akciova Spolecnost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Augstein v. Banska A Hutni Akciova Spolecnost, 282 A.D. 929, 125 N.Y.S.2d 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

The orders appealed from are modified to the extent that the objections of the defendants to the jurisdiction of the court are overruled, and in the exercise of discretion defendants are allowed to allege the same facts presented upon this motion in their respective answers (Civ. Prac. Act, § 237-a, subd. 3, par. [c]). Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel

and Bastow, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm; Callahan, J., taking no part. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Israel-British Bank (London) Limited
401 F. Supp. 1159 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Schwartz v. Compania Azucarera Vertientes- Camaguey De Cuba
28 Misc. 2d 355 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Stephen v. Zivnostenska Banka
31 Misc. 2d 45 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D. 929, 125 N.Y.S.2d 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augstein-v-banska-a-hutni-akciova-spolecnost-nyappdiv-1953.