Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton

Supreme Court

Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton

254 U.S. 610, 41 S. Ct. 60

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 8, 1920·No. No. 217·Published

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 25, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. [611] S. 300,303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Maucher, 248 U. S. 359, 362; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118. Mr. Earl H. Turner for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Goeke, Mr. T. T. Ansberry and Mr. George T. Farrell for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 25, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. [611] S. 300,303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Maucher, 248 U. S. 359, 362; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118. Mr. Earl H. Turner for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Goeke, Mr. T. T. Ansberry and Mr. George T. Farrell for defendants in error.

Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton, 254 U.S. 610, 41 S. Ct. 60 (1920).

Pincite

254 U.S. 610 (Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related