Augen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Augen v. State

546 So. 2d 134, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1713, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4026, 1989 WL 78345

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 19, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2609

StatusPublished

This text of 546 So. 2d 134 (Augen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Augen v. State, 546 So. 2d 134, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1713, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4026, 1989 WL 78345 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed without prejudice to the right of the defendant to seek to withdraw his plea by an appropriate motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See generally Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). See also Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Butler v. State, 492 So.2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Glover v. State, 469 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed without prejudice to the right of the defendant to seek to withdraw his plea by an appropriate motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See generally Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). See also Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Butler v. State, 492 So.2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Glover v. State, 469 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

546 So. 2d 134, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1713, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4026, 1989 WL 78345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augen-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack