Augello v. Denigris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Augello v. Denigris

239 A.D.2d 372, 658 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5118

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 A.D.2d 372 (Augello v. Denigris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Augello v. Denigris, 239 A.D.2d 372, 658 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated August 8, 1996, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to CPLR 3212 (e).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The affirmation prepared by the defendants’ expert which was submitted in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion presented no triable issues of fact as to whether the defendant Joseph Denigris was negligent in falling asleep at the wheel of an automobile while driving (cf., Harvey v Dileno, 35 AD2d 668; Cicero v Clark, 23 AD2d 583). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated August 8, 1996, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to CPLR 3212 (e).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The affirmation prepared by the defendants’ expert which was submitted in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion presented no triable issues of fact as to whether the defendant Joseph Denigris was negligent in falling asleep at the wheel of an automobile while driving (cf., Harvey v Dileno, 35 AD2d 668; Cicero v Clark, 23 AD2d 583). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 372, 658 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augello-v-denigris-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack