Augat v. Tetmeyer

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Augat v. Tetmeyer

108 A. 510, 94 Conn. 256

DecidedDecember 5, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A. 510 (Augat v. Tetmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Augat v. Tetmeyer, 108 A. 510, 94 Conn. 256 (Colo. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Certain items of the defendant’s counterclaim were allowed in reduction of the amount claimed by the plaintiff; others were disallowed. The finding conclusively settled every matter in dispute, save an item of interest amounting to something over $4, which it is claimed the court erroneously allowed. This did not justify an appeal, and our disposition of the case is manifestly controlled by Neville v. Frary, 88 Conn. 50, 89 Atl. 882, and the earlier cases there referred to.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Certain items of the defendant’s counterclaim were allowed in reduction of the amount claimed by the plaintiff; others were disallowed. The finding conclusively settled every matter in dispute, save an item of interest amounting to something over $4, which it is claimed the court erroneously allowed. This did not justify an appeal, and our disposition of the case is manifestly controlled by Neville v. Frary, 88 Conn. 50, 89 Atl. 882, and the earlier cases there referred to.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A. 510, 94 Conn. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augat-v-tetmeyer-conn-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack