Home/Supreme Court/Auflick v. Wainwright

Auflick v. Wainwright

374 U.S. 494, 83 S. Ct. 1887, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1047, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 994
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1963·No. 979, Misc·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

374 U.S. 494 (1963)

AUFLICK
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.

No. 979, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Auflick v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 494, 83 S. Ct. 1887, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1047, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 994 (1963).

374 U.S. 494 (Auflick v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
157 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)