Home/Supreme Court/Auflick v. Wainwright

Auflick v. Wainwright

374 U.S. 494, 83 S. Ct. 1887, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1047, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 994
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 17, 1963
Docket979, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 374 U.S. 494 (Auflick v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Auflick v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 494, 83 S. Ct. 1887, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1047, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 994 (1963).

Opinion

374 U.S. 494 (1963)

AUFLICK
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.

No. 979, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
157 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 U.S. 494, 83 S. Ct. 1887, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1047, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auflick-v-wainwright-scotus-1963.