Auflick v. Wainwright

155 So. 2d 365, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 2911
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 26, 1963·No. No. 32147·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter recurs for consideration upon the judgment and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. Pursuant to the directions of that Court it is now found that the petition, if proved, alleged grounds for post-conviction relief. In order to expedite the disposition of the matter we decline to issue a writ of habeas corpus, but expressly without prejudice to the petitioner to proceed under Florida Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, 31 F.S.A. See Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, and on remand, Gideon v. Wainwright, (Fla.) 153 So.2d 299.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Auflick v. Wainwright, 155 So. 2d 365, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 2911 (Fla. 1963).

155 So. 2d 365 (Auflick v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Shiappacossee
155 So. 2d 365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)