Aufiero v. Aufiero
227 A.D. 618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aufiero v. Aufiero. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D. 479 →
Opinion
Order denying motion to require plaintiff to separately state and number causes of action and to cancel lis pendens affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aufiero v. Aufiero, 227 A.D. 618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
227 A.D. 618 (Aufiero v. Aufiero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.