Auerfeld v. Feuer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Auerfeld v. Feuer

98 N.Y.S. 687

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 27, 1906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding the objections made by the defendants’ attorney, that attorney remained in court and took part in the trial, so that there was a trial in a court of competent jurisdiction before a justice who-was at least a de facto justice. We cannot take judicial notice, of the truth of all the statements made on the preliminary motion, when the defendants objected to the trials of the actions before the justice who was then holding court.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding the objections made by the defendants’ attorney, that attorney remained in court and took part in the trial, so that there was a trial in a court of competent jurisdiction before a justice who-was at least a de facto justice. We cannot take judicial notice, of the truth of all the statements made on the preliminary motion, when the defendants objected to the trials of the actions before the justice who was then holding court.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed, with costs.

Auerfeld v. Feuer, 98 N.Y.S. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

98 N.Y.S. 687 (Auerfeld v. Feuer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.