Auer v. Stackley
This text of 37 F.3d 1503 (Auer v. Stackley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
37 F.3d 1503
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Charles Duane AUER, Appellant,
v.
Fred STACKLEY, Jr.; Linda Stackley Sigle; Dennis Stackley;
Mark A. Stackley; Karen Stackley Peralez; Carol
Stackley Mould; Appellees,
Ginger Stackley Dominguez, Defendant.
No. 94-1387WA.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: October 5, 1994.
Filed: October 13, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Charles Duane Auer appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in this diversity action. Upon review, we find no error that would require reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 F.3d 1503, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auer-v-stackley-ca8-1994.