Auer v. Dressel
118 N.E.2d 912, 306 N.Y. 854, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1179
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Auer v. Dressel. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 N.Y. 427 →
Opinion
[855]*855Motion granted and James D. Mooney, as president of R. Hoe & Co., Inc., substituted as a party respondent in the place and stead of Arthur Dressel, individually and as president of R. Hoe & Co., Inc., on the appeal herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Auer v. Dressel, 118 N.E.2d 912, 306 N.Y. 854, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1179 (N.Y. 1954).
118 N.E.2d 912 (Auer v. Dressel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.