Audrey Locke v. United States

63 F. App'x 971
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2003·No. 02-3152·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*972 PER CURIAM.

Audrey Locke appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her emotional-distress claims brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we agree with the district court that it lacked jurisdiction over those claims. Thus, the court properly dismissed her complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h); Sheridan v. United States, 487 U.S. 392, 399, 108 S.Ct. 2449, 101 L.Ed.2d 352 (1988); Stratmeyer v. Engberg, 649 N.W.2d 921, 925 (S.D.2002).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles B. Kommann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Audrey Locke v. United States, 63 F. App'x 971 (8th Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 971 (Audrey Locke v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boney v. Valline
597 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Nevada, 2009)
LaVallie v. United States
396 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (D. North Dakota, 2005)