Audrey Locke v. United States

63 F. App'x 971
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 2003
Docket02-3152
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 F. App'x 971 (Audrey Locke v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Audrey Locke v. United States, 63 F. App'x 971 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

*972 PER CURIAM.

Audrey Locke appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her emotional-distress claims brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we agree with the district court that it lacked jurisdiction over those claims. Thus, the court properly dismissed her complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h); Sheridan v. United States, 487 U.S. 392, 399, 108 S.Ct. 2449, 101 L.Ed.2d 352 (1988); Stratmeyer v. Engberg, 649 N.W.2d 921, 925 (S.D.2002).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles B. Kommann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boney v. Valline
597 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Nevada, 2009)
LaVallie v. United States
396 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (D. North Dakota, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F. App'x 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/audrey-locke-v-united-states-ca8-2003.