Audenreid's Appeal
89 Pa. 114, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 110
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered March 17th 1879,
A careful examination of the proofs and consideration of the able arguments, oral and printed, of the learned and zealous counsel for the appellants have failed to convince us that there was any error in the decree appealed from. The opinion of the, learned president of the court below so clearly expresses the views we entertain of the case that we deem it unnecessary to add anything.
Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Audenreid's Appeal, 89 Pa. 114, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 110 (Pa. 1879).
89 Pa. 114 (Audenreid's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Estate of Evasew
584 A.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. Roth
24 Pa. D. & C. 286 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Seeds v. Franklin
16 Pa. D. & C. 489 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Metropolitan Refining Co. v. Beaver Valley Mill Supply Co.
14 Pa. D. & C. 454 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Gladden v. Keistler
140 S.E. 161 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)
Cridge's Estate
137 A. 455 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Heller v. Heller's Executors
3 Pa. D. & C. 246 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Sargeant v. National Life Insurance
41 A. 351 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Doran v. McConlogue
24 A. 357 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)