Audas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Audas v. State

1917 OK CR 168, 166 P. 449, 13 Okla. Crim. 737, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided July 21, 1917·No. No. A-2147.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, R. M. Audas, was convicted in tbe county court of Harmon county on a charge of torturing and killing an animal, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50.

The Attorney General lias filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a nonresident of the State' of Oklahoma and is not now amenable to the order of this court. The motion is conceded by counsel for plaintiff In error. In addition, the motion is supported by an affidavit of a resident of the county in which the conviction occurred.

We find, therefore, that the motion should be sustained, and the appeal dismissed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, R. M. Audas, was convicted in tbe county court of Harmon county on a charge of torturing and killing an animal, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50.

The Attorney General lias filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a nonresident of the State' of Oklahoma and is not now amenable to the order of this court. The motion is conceded by counsel for plaintiff In error. In addition, the motion is supported by an affidavit of a resident of the county in which the conviction occurred.

We find, therefore, that the motion should be sustained, and the appeal dismissed. It is so ordered.

Audas v. State, 1917 OK CR 168, 166 P. 449, 13 Okla. Crim. 737, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

1917 OK CR 168 (Audas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related