Auclair v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

505 A.2d 431, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 419
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMarch 4, 1986
Docket85-161-Appeal
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 505 A.2d 431 (Auclair v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Auclair v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, 505 A.2d 431, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 419 (R.I. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This case came before a hearing panel of this court for oral agrument on February 18, 1986 pursuant to an order which had directed both the plaintiffs and the defendant to show cause why this case should not be summarily decided.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court was correct in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. The granting of summary judgment was correct, since there is no duty on the part of an insurance carrier for a third party to settle promptly with a claimant. The relationship between the claimant and the insurance carrier for a third party alleged to be liable is an adversary relationship giving rise to no fiduciary obligation on the part of such insurance carrier to the claimant. Any obligation to deal with settlement offers in good faith runs only to the insured, see Bean v. Allstate Ins. Co., 285 Md. 572, 403 A.2d 793 (1979) and cases cited therein.

For the reasons stated, the plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed. The summary judgment entered in the Superior Court is affirmed.

The papers in the case may be remanded to the Superior Court.

BEVILACQUA, C.J., and KELLEHER, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Summit Ins. Co. v. Stricklett
199 A.3d 523 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2019)
Ennen v. Integon Indemnity Corp.
268 P.3d 277 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2012)
Knotts v. Zurich Insurance Co.
197 S.W.3d 512 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2006)
Fratus v. Obert, 88-2619 (2001)
Superior Court of Rhode Island, 2001
Canavan v. Lovett, Schefrin and Harnett
745 A.2d 173 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2000)
Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
504 S.E.2d 893 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1998)
Brown v. Candelora
708 A.2d 104 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Cianci v. Nationwide Insurance Co.
659 A.2d 662 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1995)
Larocque v. State Farm Insurance
660 A.2d 286 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1995)
Ciarleglio v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., No. Cv90 0276028 S (Dec. 16, 1993)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 11032 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)
Pixton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
809 P.2d 746 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1991)
O.K. Lumber Co. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.
759 P.2d 523 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 A.2d 431, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auclair-v-nationwide-mutual-insurance-ri-1986.