Auchincloss v. Commissioner

11 B.T.A. 947
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedMay 2, 1928
DocketDocket No. 24312
StatusPublished

This text of 11 B.T.A. 947 (Auchincloss v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Auchincloss v. Commissioner, 11 B.T.A. 947 (bta 1928).

Opinion

[948]*948OPINION.

Littleton:

It is contended by the petitioner that amounts collected by him as the executor on account of services rendered prior [949]*949to the decedent’s death, represented capital in the hands of the estate at decedent’s death, and, therefore, were not taxable income when received by the estate. On the other hand, Commissioner contends that amounts collected constituted taxable income when received by the estate.

The claim of the executor is correct. Nichols v. United States, (Ct. Cls.), 6 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 6592; Walter R. McCarthy, Executor, 9 B. T. A. 525; George Nichols et al., Executors, 10 B. T. A. 919.

Judgment of no'deficiency will he entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 B.T.A. 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auchincloss-v-commissioner-bta-1928.