Auchincloss v. Commissioner

11 B.T.A. 947, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3679
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided May 2, 1928·No. Docket No. 24312.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[948] OPINION.

Littleton:

It is contended by the petitioner that amounts collected by him as the executor on account of services rendered prior [949] to the decedent’s death, represented capital in the hands of the estate at decedent’s death, and, therefore, were not taxable income when received by the estate. On the other hand, Commissioner contends that amounts collected constituted taxable income when received by the estate.

The claim of the executor is correct. Nichols v. United States, (Ct. Cls.), 6 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 6592; Walter R. McCarthy, Executor, 9 B. T. A. 525; George Nichols et al., Executors, 10 B. T. A. 919.

Judgment of no'deficiency will he entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Auchincloss v. Commissioner, 11 B.T.A. 947, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3679 (bta 1928).

11 B.T.A. 947 (Auchincloss v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auchincloss v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 947 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)