Auburn Urban Renewal Agency v. SAMUEL SCHWARTZ SONS, INC.
363 N.E.2d 1384, 41 N.Y.2d 1026, 41 N.Y. 1026, 395 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2075
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (53 AD2d 1051).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Auburn Urban Renewal Agency v. SAMUEL SCHWARTZ SONS, INC., 363 N.E.2d 1384, 41 N.Y.2d 1026, 41 N.Y. 1026, 395 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2075 (N.Y. 1977).
363 N.E.2d 1384 (Auburn Urban Renewal Agency v. SAMUEL SCHWARTZ SONS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saratoga County Sewer District 1 v. Gordon
101 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Olean Urban Renewal Agency v. Terrace Broadway Co.
77 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Poughkeepsie Urban Renewal Agency v. Dutchess Glass Co.
76 A.D.2d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Matter of Urban Renewal [Patchen Post]
379 N.E.2d 169 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)