AUBURN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. Sebelius
642 F.3d 1145, 685 F.3d 1059, 401 U.S. App. D.C. 435, 2011 WL 8317254, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25431
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 20, 2011·No. 10-5115·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
ORDER
Upon consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
AUBURN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. Sebelius, 642 F.3d 1145, 685 F.3d 1059, 401 U.S. App. D.C. 435, 2011 WL 8317254, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25431 (D.C. Cir. 2011).
642 F.3d 1145 (AUBURN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. Sebelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oakland Physicians Med. Ctr. v. Azar
330 F. Supp. 3d 391 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
State of Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Medicaid & Medical Assistance v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
272 F. Supp. 3d 103 (District of Columbia, 2017)