Auburn Publishers, Inc. v. Netti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Auburn Publishers, Inc. v. Netti

229 A.D.2d 988, 645 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9040

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 A.D.2d 988 (Auburn Publishers, Inc. v. Netti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Auburn Publishers, Inc. v. Netti, 229 A.D.2d 988, 645 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order denying its application for attorney’s fees pursuant to Public Officers Law § 107 (2). The court denied the application based upon its belief that it could award attorney’s fees only where violations of the Open Meetings Law were repetitious or egregious; that belief is erroneous (see, Gordon v Village of Monticello, 87 NY2d 124, 126-128). We therefore remit the matter to Supreme Court for determination of the application in accordance with the standard set forth in Gordon v Village of Monticello (supra, at 126-128). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J.—Attorney’s Fees.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order denying its application for attorney’s fees pursuant to Public Officers Law § 107 (2). The court denied the application based upon its belief that it could award attorney’s fees only where violations of the Open Meetings Law were repetitious or egregious; that belief is erroneous (see, Gordon v Village of Monticello, 87 NY2d 124, 126-128). We therefore remit the matter to Supreme Court for determination of the application in accordance with the standard set forth in Gordon v Village of Monticello (supra, at 126-128). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J.—Attorney’s Fees.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D.2d 988, 645 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auburn-publishers-inc-v-netti-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack