Auburn Opera House & Pavilion Ass'n v. Hill

32 P. 587, 3 Cal. Unrep. 839, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1019
California Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1893·No. No. 18,097·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

1. Under defendant’s contract of subscription for the stocks of plaintiff, as contained in the prospectus signed by defendant, and upon the facts alleged in the complaint as to plaintiff’s calls or demands for the amount agreed to be paid for such subscribed stock, the plaintiff is entitled to maintain this action: Marysville Electric Light Co. v. Johnson, 93 Cal. 546, 27 Am. St. Rep. 215, 29 Pac. 126; California Southern Hotel Co. v. Callender, 94 Cal. 120, 28 Am. St. Rep. 99, 29 Pac. 859.

2. It was not a condition precedent to defendant’s liability that $20,000 of plaintiff’s stock should be first subscribed for; but, were it otherwise, the defendant has waived the objection which he now makes upon this ground: Hotel Co. v. Callender, supra. Indeed, the acts of defendant constituting such waiver are stronger than those held to have that effect in the case cited. Judgment and order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Auburn Opera House & Pavilion Ass'n v. Hill, 32 P. 587, 3 Cal. Unrep. 839, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1019 (Cal. 1893).

32 P. 587 (Auburn Opera House & Pavilion Ass'n v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton v. Bell
55 P. 758 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Auburn Opera House & Pavilion Ass'n v. Hill
45 P. 695 (California Supreme Court, 1896)