Auburn Medical Center, Inc. v. State Health Planning & Development Agency
This text of 814 So. 2d 266 (Auburn Medical Center, Inc. v. State Health Planning & Development Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari is de-nje(j
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is confusing in one respect. In our opinion remanding this case to the Court of Civil Appeals, Ex parte East Alabama Health Care Authority, 814 So.2d 260 (Ala.2001), we did not hold, or even imply, that Auburn Medical Center, Inc., “was required to seek a fair-hearing as a prerequisite to judicial review,” as the Court of Civil Appeals states in its opinion. Auburn Medical Center, Inc. v. State Health Planning & Dev. Agency, 814 So.2d 264 (Ala.Civ.App.2001). However, the Court of Civil Appeals goes on to correctly state what our remand required: “The supreme court instructed this court to address on remand the remaining issues argued by Auburn Medical Center that we did not address in Auburn Medical Center [v. State Health Planning & Dev. Agency, 814 So.2d 258 (Ala.Civ.App.2000)]. We win now do so.” The Court of Civil Appeals then concluded that Auburn Medical Center was required to séek a fair-hearing as a prerequisite to judicial review.
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
814 So. 2d 266, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 302, 2001 WL 996056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auburn-medical-center-inc-v-state-health-planning-development-agency-ala-2001.