Auburn Container Co. v. Solvay Paperboard, L.P.

277 A.D.2d 995, 715 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11387

This text of 277 A.D.2d 995 (Auburn Container Co. v. Solvay Paperboard, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Auburn Container Co. v. Solvay Paperboard, L.P., 277 A.D.2d 995, 715 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The terms of the unambiguous contract between the parties must be afforded their fair and reasonable meanings (see, Abiele Contr. v New York City School Constr. Auth., 91 NY2d 1, 9-10), and thus we agree with the court that tertiary fiber was not waste. Because the contract provided for plaintiff to transport waste from defendant’s manufacturing facility to a specified landfill, defendant did not breach the exclusivity provision of the contract by contracting with a third party to transport tertiary fiber. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.— [996]*996Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abiele Contracting, Inc. v. New York City School Construction Authority
689 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 995, 715 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auburn-container-co-v-solvay-paperboard-lp-nyappdiv-2000.