Aubuchon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of Aubuchon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Aubuchon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1833V UNPUBLISHED
KLAUDIA AUBUCHON, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: February 27, 2020 v. Vaccine Rule 21(a); No Judgment; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Order Concluding Proceedings; HUMAN SERVICES, Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss
Respondent.
Alan K. Nicollette, Nordstrom, Steele, Tustin, CA , for petitioner.
Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1
On February 24, 2020, Petitioner filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) in the above-captioned case. In support of this Motion, Petitioner states that a petition was previously filed on behalf of Petitioner by another counsel. The Vaccine Act states that “[o]nly one petition may be filed with respect to each administration of a vaccine.” 42 U.S.C. §300aa-11(b)(2). Thus, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED.
Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aubuchon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aubuchon-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2020.