Aubuchon v. Federal Land Bank

715 S.W.2d 6, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4156
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1986·No. No. 50662·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued defendants to quiet title to real estate claiming defendants were squatters on property her father had acquired by adverse possession and had deeded to her. She appeals from a judgment for defendants. Defendants move to dismiss the appeal for plaintiff’s failure to comply with Rule 84.04.

Plaintiff’s appeal is certainly subject to dismissal for failure to file an acceptable brief. In the interest of judicial economy, however, we deny defendants’ motion and dispose of the appeal on its merits. The record before us is devoid of evidence that would support plaintiff’s claim to the real estate defendants possess. The trial court therefore properly found for defendants. An opinion would have no precedential value. Affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aubuchon v. Federal Land Bank, 715 S.W.2d 6, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4156 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

715 S.W.2d 6 (Aubuchon v. Federal Land Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.