Aubrey L. Jones v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

235 F.2d 22, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 263, 109 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 451, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 7, 1956
Docket13050_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 F.2d 22 (Aubrey L. Jones v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aubrey L. Jones v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, 235 F.2d 22, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 263, 109 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 451, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Opinion

235 F.2d 22

98 U.S.App.D.C. 263, 109 U.S.P.Q. 451

Aubrey L. JONES, Appellant,
v.
Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.

No. 13050.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 23, 1956.
Decided June 7, 1956.

Mr. J. Warren Kinney, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Ohio, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. James W. Dent, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant in a suit to obtain a patent. 35 U.S.C. § 145 (1952), R.S. 4915.

We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 F.2d 22, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 263, 109 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 451, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aubrey-l-jones-v-robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-patents-cadc-1956.