AUBERLIN v. State

270 S.W.3d 522, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1667, 2008 WL 5131027
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 2008·No. WD 69220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant John R. Auberlin appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief. After a jury trial, Auberlin was convicted in Macon County Circuit Court of attempted forcible rape, § 566.030 1 ; two counts of forcible sodomy, § 566.060; kidnapping, § 565.110, and first degree burglary, § 569.160. On appeal, Auberlin argues that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective because he stipulated to the foundation for certain inculpatory evidence, in exchange for the State’s agreement not to present rebuttal evidence countering one of Auberlin’s principal defense theories. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AUBERLIN v. State, 270 S.W.3d 522, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1667, 2008 WL 5131027 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

270 S.W.3d 522 (AUBERLIN v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PROKUP v. Magers
270 S.W.3d 522 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)