Atwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Atwood v. State

469 So. 2d 908, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1282, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14065

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1864

StatusPublished

This text of 469 So. 2d 908 (Atwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atwood v. State, 469 So. 2d 908, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1282, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14065 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and vacate the appellant’s sentence because the trial judge departed from the sentencing guidelines without clear and convincing reasons. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions to either provide a written statement delineating clear and convincing reasons for departure or to resentence appellant under the guidelines. Boynton v. State, 10 FLW 795 (Fla. 4th DCA March 27, 1985).

DOWNEY, HERSEY, and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and vacate the appellant’s sentence because the trial judge departed from the sentencing guidelines without clear and convincing reasons. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions to either provide a written statement delineating clear and convincing reasons for departure or to resentence appellant under the guidelines. Boynton v. State, 10 FLW 795 (Fla. 4th DCA March 27, 1985).

DOWNEY, HERSEY, and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

469 So. 2d 908, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1282, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atwood-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.