Atwood v. McRae

133 So. 892, 101 Fla. 277
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 21, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 133 So. 892 (Atwood v. McRae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atwood v. McRae, 133 So. 892, 101 Fla. 277 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Brown are of opinion that the orders of the Circuit Court should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the orders should be reversed. "When the members of the Supreme Court are sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Wi-iitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 892, 101 Fla. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atwood-v-mcrae-fla-1931.