Atwood v. Austin
16 Johns. 180
Opinion
The proceeding was severe and. unjust. The trial was not, in fact, delayed by the defendant; he came in time to prove the only defence which he had set. up, yiz. : payment; and he offered a witness to prove it, immediately after the plaintiff rested his cause.
Judgment reversed,
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atwood v. Austin, 16 Johns. 180 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
16 Johns. 180 (Atwood v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Levenson v. Arnold
97 N.Y.S. 990 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Thompson v. Sheridan
29 N.Y.S. 868 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)