Atwood v. Austin

16 Johns. 180
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1819·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proceeding was severe and. unjust. The trial was not, in fact, delayed by the defendant; he came in time to prove the only defence which he had set. up, yiz. : payment; and he offered a witness to prove it, immediately after the plaintiff rested his cause.

Judgment reversed,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atwood v. Austin, 16 Johns. 180 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

16 Johns. 180 (Atwood v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levenson v. Arnold
97 N.Y.S. 990 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Thompson v. Sheridan
29 N.Y.S. 868 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)