Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Atwood v. Administrator.

Atwood v. Administrator.

103 S.E. 170, 150 Ga. 198, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 108
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1920
DocketNo. 1718
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 170 (Atwood v. Administrator.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atwood v. Administrator., 103 S.E. 170, 150 Ga. 198, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 108 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Where, upon the trial of a claim case the validity of the conveyance under which the claimant asserts his right depends upon whether it was fraudulent, and the evidence, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom does not demand a particular verdict, it is error for the court to direct the jury to find a verdict. Civil Code (1910), § 5926; compare Stephens v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 147 Ga. 410 (94 S. E. 245).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffin v. Barbaree
103 S.E.2d 557 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Norris v. Coffee
58 S.E.2d 812 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Hughes v. Cobb
23 S.E.2d 701 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Scruggs v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.
166 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Callaway v. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia
144 S.E. 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Kelly v. Cates
138 S.E. 280 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 170, 150 Ga. 198, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atwood-v-administrator-ga-1920.