Atwell v. Winkler

196 A.D. 946, 188 N.Y.S. 158
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 A.D. 946 (Atwell v. Winkler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atwell v. Winkler, 196 A.D. 946, 188 N.Y.S. 158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

The sealed verdict for defendant is against the court’s plain charge. To find defendant free from blame, the jury must have disregarded his own account of the way he ran the car from the Boulevard into Bay Sixty-second street, his rash run toward the shore ending in breakneck plunge through the barriers to the beach beneath. If the jury got the unfounded idea that one having a friendly gratuitous ride was not entitled to proper care, and had no remedy for such carelessness, they failed to heed what the court had plainly laid down for their guidance. The order setting aside this verdict is, therefore, [947]*947unanimously affirmed, with, costs. Present — Mills, Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nix v. Williams
35 A.D.2d 188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 A.D. 946, 188 N.Y.S. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atwell-v-winkler-nyappdiv-1921.