Atwell v. New York City Transit Authority

94 A.D.3d 620, 942 N.Y.S.2d 351
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered February 17, 2011, which denied defendant New York City Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While defendant initially established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, plaintiffs evidence raises an issue of fact as to whether she appeared to be capable of negotiating the height differential, and thus, whether defendants owed her a duty to kneel the bus (see Trainer v City of New York, 41 AD3d 202 [2007]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atwell v. New York City Transit Authority, 94 A.D.3d 620, 942 N.Y.S.2d 351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

94 A.D.3d 620 (Atwell v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saidoff v. New York City Transit Authority
105 A.D.3d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)