Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.

468 F. App'x 338
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 2012
DocketNo. 11-2187
StatusPublished

This text of 468 F. App'x 338 (Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc., 468 F. App'x 338 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Atwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atwell’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Atwell v. Am. Sugar Refining, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01378-WMN, 2011 WL 4501288 (D.Md. Sept. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F. App'x 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atwell-v-american-sugar-refining-inc-ca4-2012.