Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.

468 F. App'x 338

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2012·No. No. 11-2187·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Atwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atwell’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Atwell v. Am. Sugar Refining, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01378-WMN, 2011 WL 4501288 (D.Md. Sept. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Atwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atwell’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Atwell v. Am. Sugar Refining, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01378-WMN, 2011 WL 4501288 (D.Md. Sept. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc., 468 F. App'x 338 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

468 F. App'x 338 (Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.