Atwater v. City of Lago Vista

171 F.3d 258

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atwater v. City of Lago Vista. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 F.3d 242 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 29, 1999·No. 98-50302·Published

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

*259 IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 171 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

171 F.3d 258 (Atwater v. City of Lago Vista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.