ATTY. GRIEVANCE COMM. v. Butler
20 A.3d 103, 419 Md. 626
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 18, 2011·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 33, Sept. Term 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Anthony Ignatius BUTLER, Jr., Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 18th day of May, 2011;
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Anthony Ignatius Butler, Jr., be, and he is hereby, reprimanded and it is further
ORDERED, that judgment shall be entered in favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $1,122.00 for costs against the Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ATTY. GRIEVANCE COMM. v. Butler, 20 A.3d 103, 419 Md. 626 (Md. 2011).
20 A.3d 103 (ATTY. GRIEVANCE COMM. v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
East Oliver Street Ltd. Partnership v. Mayor of Baltimore City
20 A.3d 103 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)