ATTY. GRIEVANCE COMM. v. Butler
This text of 20 A.3d 103 (ATTY. GRIEVANCE COMM. v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Anthony Ignatius BUTLER, Jr., Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 18th day of May, 2011;
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Anthony Ignatius Butler, Jr., be, and he is hereby, reprimanded and it is further
ORDERED, that judgment shall be entered in favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $1,122.00 for costs against the Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 A.3d 103, 419 Md. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atty-grievance-comm-v-butler-md-2011.