Attorney Grievance v. Wu

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 19, 2017
Docket121ag/16
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. Wu (Attorney Grievance v. Wu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Wu, (Md. 2017).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner

v. • Misc. Docket AG • No. 121 JAMES P. WU September Term, 2016 Respondent

* * ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant

to Maryland Rule 19-736, and Respondent's acknowledgment therein that sufficient evidence

exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules

1.15(a) and (d), 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct,

in effect prior to July 1,2016, Maryland Rules 16-604, 16-605, 16-606.1, 16-607, and 16-609, in

effect prior to July 1, 2016, and Business Occupations and Professions Article § 10-304 and

§ 10-306 and § 10-307, it is this 119 tbday of June ,2017, ORDERED, that Respondent, James P. Wu, be and he is hereby disbarred from the

practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of James P. Wu from the

register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of such action, and comply with the notice

provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance v. Wu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-wu-md-2017.