Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim (Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner • Misc gocket AG v. • No. 1-1 • September Term, 2016 WOO-MN KIM
Respondent ***********************************************
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient evidence
exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules
1.15(a) and 8.4(b), (c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct in effect at
the time of the misconduct, it is this 16th day of sentember ,2016,
ORDERED, that Woo-Jin Kim, Respondent, is hereby disbarred by consent from the
practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Woo-Jin Kim from the
register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in accordance
with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(1), and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland
Rule 19-761(b).
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-woo-jin-kim-md-2016.