Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 16, 2016
Docket33ag/16
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim (Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim, (Md. 2016).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner • Misc gocket AG v. • No. 1-1 • September Term, 2016 WOO-MN KIM

Respondent ***********************************************

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant

to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient evidence

exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules

1.15(a) and 8.4(b), (c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct in effect at

the time of the misconduct, it is this 16th day of sentember ,2016,

ORDERED, that Woo-Jin Kim, Respondent, is hereby disbarred by consent from the

practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Woo-Jin Kim from the

register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in accordance

with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(1), and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland

Rule 19-761(b).

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance v. Woo-Jin Kim, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-woo-jin-kim-md-2016.