Attorney Grievance v. Woloszyn
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Woloszyn (Attorney Grievance v. Woloszyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner * * Misc. Docket AG v. * No. 17 * September Term, 2014 JOHN J. WOLOSZYN * * In the Circuit Court Respondent * for Baltimore City *
Case No. 24-C-14-0036ll AG
* ******************************************#****
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent acknowledged Petitioner can produce sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 8.l(b) and 8.4(a)-(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 'ztth day of september , 2014,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that John J. Woloszyn, Respondent, be, and he hereby is, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, in accordance with Rule l6-772(d), shall strike the name of John J. Woloszyn fi~om the register of attorneys in this Court and certify to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the clerks of all courts in this
State that the name of John J. Woloszyn has been so stricken.
/S/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. Seni0r Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Woloszyn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-woloszyn-md-2014.