Attorney Grievance v. Winter
This text of 483 Md. 434 (Attorney Grievance v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE * ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE SUPREME COURT COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No. 1 JUSTIN MICHAEL WINTER * September Term, 2023 *
ORDER
Pursuant to Rule 19-738, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its Petition for
Disciplinary or Remedial Action upon respondent’s conviction of a serious crime. Pursuant
to Rule 19-738(d), the Court required the Commission to serve the Petition on the
respondent and required the respondent to show cause why he should not be temporarily
suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland. No response was filed.
Accordingly, it is this 21st day of April 2023, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-738(e) and effective immediately, respondent
Jason Michael Winter is temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the State of
Maryland pending further order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jason Michael
Winter from the register of attorneys authorized to practice law in the State of Maryland
and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of
all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b). Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader 2023-04-21 15:42-04:00 Chief Justice
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 Md. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-winter-md-2023.