Attorney Grievance v. Winter

483 Md. 434
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 21, 2023·No. 1ag/23·Published

Opinion

*

IN THE

*

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE SUPREME COURT

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

*

OF MARYLAND

v.

*

AG Docket No. 1

JUSTIN MICHAEL WINTER

*

September Term, 2023

*

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 19-738, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its Petition for

Disciplinary or Remedial Action upon respondent’s conviction of a serious crime. Pursuant

to Rule 19-738(d), the Court required the Commission to serve the Petition on the

respondent and required the respondent to show cause why he should not be temporarily

suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland. No response was filed.

Accordingly, it is this 21st day of April 2023, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-738(e) and effective immediately, respondent

Jason Michael Winter is temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the State of

Maryland pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jason Michael

Winter from the register of attorneys authorized to practice law in the State of Maryland

and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of

all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b). Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

2023-04-21 15:42-04:00 Chief Justice

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Winter, 483 Md. 434 (Md. 2023).

483 Md. 434 (Attorney Grievance v. Winter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.