Attorney Grievance v. Whittle
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 200 Harry S. Truman Pkwy, Suite 300 OF MARYLAND Annapolis, MD 21401 Misc. Docket AG
Petitioner,
No. 50
V.
September Term, 2015
Arthur John Whittle, Esquire
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for
Reprimand by Consent, and the Court having considered same,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 8th day of February ,2016,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Arthur John Whittle, Respondent,
is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rules 1.4(a)(2) and
8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Lynne A. Battaglia Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance v. Whittle (Attorney Grievance v. Whittle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.