Attorney Grievance v. Whittle
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Whittle (Attorney Grievance v. Whittle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 200 Harry S. Truman Pkwy, Suite 300 OF MARYLAND Annapolis, MD 21401 Misc. Docket AG Petitioner, No. 50 V. September Term, 2015 Arthur John Whittle, Esquire
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for
Reprimand by Consent, and the Court having considered same,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 8th day of February ,2016,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Arthur John Whittle, Respondent,
is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rules 1.4(a)(2) and
8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Lynne A. Battaglia Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Whittle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-whittle-md-2016.