Attorney Grievance v. Whittle

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 8, 2016·No. 50ag/15·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 200 Harry S. Truman Pkwy, Suite 300 OF MARYLAND Annapolis, MD 21401 Misc. Docket AG

Petitioner,

No. 50

V.

September Term, 2015

Arthur John Whittle, Esquire

Respondent.

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for

Reprimand by Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 8th day of February ,2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Arthur John Whittle, Respondent,

is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rules 1.4(a)(2) and

8.1(b) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct.

/s/ Lynne A. Battaglia Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Whittle, (Md. 2016).

Attorney Grievance v. Whittle (Attorney Grievance v. Whittle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.